X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EACe3T0+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABDtA+BB4F9AQEBBBIBHQpRAQgYCgYYB1cBBBsah2MBnyOBJwGXCo0xAkQRAwECAQIChEEFVQcEBwECBQEBAQFRgj9jBIhPn38 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:54:23 -0800 Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CE5@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q21Hsfui027671 "Christopher Faylor" wrote: > > In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they > think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something > please be assured that this will not happen. OK, what would cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple