X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:20:24 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with daylight saving time, off by one hour Message-ID: <20120228182024.GK23440@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <63813 DOT 141 DOT 155 DOT 196 DOT 239 DOT 1330441201 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT farance DOT com> <20120228154850 DOT GH23440 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49324 DOT 141 DOT 155 DOT 196 DOT 239 DOT 1330445991 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT farance DOT com> <20120228165457 DOT GJ23440 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50546 DOT 141 DOT 155 DOT 196 DOT 239 DOT 1330449825 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT farance DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50546.141.155.196.239.1330449825.squirrel@mail.farance.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Feb 28 12:23, Frank Farance wrote: > > Not for me. The only difference I see is that I'm living in another > > timezone. I changed my timezone to America/New_York as well, but the time > > is still correct in ls. Without a reproducible scenario (which does not > > involve non-system, non-Cygwin tools like winSCP) it's pretty hard to > > track down why you see the wrong time information. > > Corinna, maybe my point wasn't clear above. I mentioned WinSCP to reveal > how the files arrived. However, it was via ***Windows*** tools where I > was able to see the timestamp: (1) a right-click->properties on the file You made your point entirely clear. But I really hope I made my point as clear as well. In theory it shouldn't matter how the files arrived on the machine. Still, there is the problem of reproducibility. For clearness: - My Windows timezone is "(UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna", which is +1 from UTC, +2 in DST. - My C:\Windows folder has a modification timestamp of 2011-07-16 10:15 in a standard Windows Explorer folder view. - In CMD: dir C:\ prints [...] 16.07.2011 09:15 Windows Note that it does NOT print 10:15! - In a Cygwin shell: tcsh$ echo $TZ Europe/Berlin tcsh$ cd /cygdrive/c tcsh$ ls -ld --full-time Windows drwxrwx---+ 1 ???????? ???????? 0 2011-07-16 10:15:47.190400000 +0200 Windows So Explorer and Cygwin agree on the time, only CMD is an hour off because CMD apparently ignores the fact that the file's modification timestamp is within DST, so it does not add an hour. Another example involving a cp from a remote machine: - Linux: tcsh$ echo $TZ Europe/Berlin tcsh$ ls -l --full-time x -rw-r--r--. 1 corinna vinschen 12849 2007-07-24 16:47:48.000000000 +0200 x - Cygwin: tcsh$ cp -p //linux/share/x . tcsh$ ls -ld --full-time x -rw-r--r-- 1 corinna vinschen 12849 2007-07-24 16:47:48.000000000 +0200 x - CMD: dir x 24.07.2007 15:47 12.849 x - Windows Explorer shows a timestamp of 2007-07-24 16:47. Here, too, all affected parties agree on the timestamp, only CMD doesn't. A change to another Windows timezone only offsets the timestamps, but doesn't change the general picture. > shows the correct timestamp, (2) I just tried "dir" from the command line > and got the right time, (3) but "ls -l --full-time" shows the wrong time > <-- all reproduced by system or cygwin tools. Which is kind of weird, because that's *exactly* inverse to what I observe on my machine. > FYI, I just tried a different folder that has winter files and all three > steps above report the same time. This would dispell the idea that I had > the wrong time zone, right? Well... probably. What strikes me as weird is the exact opposite behaviour from what I see. If the file is a DST file, but Explorer and CMD don't disagree by an hour, what does that mean? That would mean that Explorer doesn't treat the DST timestamp as DST timestamp for some reason. > How would you like me to debug this further? Thanks! I don't know. I can't see that anything's wrong with Cygwin here. I just searched the web and found other people having timestamp problems with WinSCP without any Cygwin involvement: http://winscp.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8382 Maybe it *is* winSCP, after all? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple