X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F4A72F0.7050300@acm.org> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:59:12 -0800 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Change in flock(2), testers welcome References: <20120226125735 DOT GM7755 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20120226125735.GM7755@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/26/2012 4:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Anyway, I was mostly interested to find a solution for this typical > usage of flock(1) for now. For those interested in this stuff, please > give it a try. You'll find it in the latest snapshot I just uploaded to > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ The APR test suite passes with the snapshot, for what it's worth. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org "Flattery is all right -- if you don't inhale." -- Adlai Stevenson -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple