X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Message-id: <4F4866A8.4030005@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:42:16 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gitk fails to start after updating cygwin References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31294ECBF AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <4F4814F0 DOT 3090006 AT cygwin DOT com> <4F481F47 DOT 7080208 AT gmail DOT com> In-reply-to: <4F481F47.7080208@gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam On 2/24/2012 6:37 PM, Mike Kaganski wrote: > 25.02.2012 9:53, Larry Hall (Cygwin) пишет: >> On 2/24/2012 5:43 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >>> My question is: are there enough gitk users who would need/want the >>> Cygwin xorg-server that it would be worth installing xorg-server by >>> default when installing gitk, even though some gitk users may not >>> actually need the Cygwin xorg-server? >> >> I would be for adding Cygiwn's xorg-server as a dependency for any >> package that needs an X-Server to be generally useful. >> > Probably xorg-server could be made a conditional dependency (not sure if > cygwin supports these), e.g. triggered by a registry value or env setting, > and it could be enabled by default, while some users could configure it to > tell the installer that they use some external X-Server? "setup.exe" doesn't support conditional dependencies but for those that would prefer to install/use another X-Server, I'm sure they can figure out how to tell "setup.exe" not to install Cygwin's X-Server. I'm sure the facility you're talking about could be added to "setup.exe" if someone were interested in providing patches to enable this though. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple