X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAOT2R0+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABDswyBB4FzAQEBBBIBHQpRAQgYCgYYB1cBBBsah2MBmAOBJwGeWY03RxECAQIBAgKETAFjBgIBBQUFBAECT4I7YwSIT598 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: gitk fails to start after updating cygwin Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:50:05 -0800 Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31294EC35@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q1OKoQx3025908 "Corinna Vinschen" wrote: > On Feb 24 11:26, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: > > > > Should xorg-server be specified as a runtime dependency of gitk? > > The X server is no hard requirement. Consider: > > $ DISPLAY=my_linux_box:0 gitk& True. But would the benefit (helping new users) outweigh the cost (installing xorg-server for some users that don't actually require it)? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple