X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com designates 10.68.225.39 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.225.39;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com designates 10.68.225.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com
Message-ID: <4F478FD2.2030909@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:25:38 +0100
From: marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20)
References: <20120222192933 DOT 0a8e03f6 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com>	<CAB8Xom93QjbOG2Jycy33GyR4EdCNix5XN3_UDe0TYGpb3vfmeg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<20120222223256 DOT 90d4fc28 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com>	<20120223083017 DOT GG7657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<ji6hq4$gff$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<20120223185023 DOT 78563996 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <CAB8Xom-fT5FsS1X42RYoc9bgNakikJ-AMQEy=fKxy5-eLnQ3kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <ji8001$vnm$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <ji8001$vnm$1@dough.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/24/2012 1:31 PM, Michael Lutz wrote:
> Am 24.02.2012 03:25 schrieb marco atzeri:
>> the cygwin's ruby package "etc.so" should be included in the rebaseall
>> list by default.
>
> I never said my script would specifically fix this problem. I only said
> that, just like for perl, it is very easy to install additional binary
> ruby modules NOT covered by cygwin's package database.
>
> As long as perlrebase is needed (and it definitely is on my computer),
> there's also the need for an equivalent rubyrebase.
>
> Michael
>

Hi Micheal
never told something different.

rebaseall, as standard, takes care of the "cygwin" dll's,
anything additional needs additional measures.

Your rubyrebase take care of the additional module installed
for ruby, while for installation from source I need to use
the "-T FileList" option of rebaseall.

The fact that in Tassilo's system ruby etc.so is not reported by
rebaseall highlight a specific serious problem on its system.

Regards
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple