X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com designates 10.68.225.39 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.225.39; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com designates 10.68.225.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com Message-ID: <4F478FD2.2030909@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:25:38 +0100 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20) References: <20120222192933 DOT 0a8e03f6 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <20120222223256 DOT 90d4fc28 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <20120223083017 DOT GG7657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120223185023 DOT 78563996 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/24/2012 1:31 PM, Michael Lutz wrote: > Am 24.02.2012 03:25 schrieb marco atzeri: >> the cygwin's ruby package "etc.so" should be included in the rebaseall >> list by default. > > I never said my script would specifically fix this problem. I only said > that, just like for perl, it is very easy to install additional binary > ruby modules NOT covered by cygwin's package database. > > As long as perlrebase is needed (and it definitely is on my computer), > there's also the need for an equivalent rubyrebase. > > Michael > Hi Micheal never told something different. rebaseall, as standard, takes care of the "cygwin" dll's, anything additional needs additional measures. Your rubyrebase take care of the additional module installed for ruby, while for installation from source I need to use the "-T FileList" option of rebaseall. The fact that in Tassilo's system ruby etc.so is not reported by rebaseall highlight a specific serious problem on its system. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple