X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:19:28 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure
Message-ID: <20120223141928.GN7657@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20120215212010 DOT GA4183 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F3C2E35 DOT 3080308 AT acm DOT org> <20120216140932 DOT GI19092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F3D2748 DOT 8080205 AT acm DOT org> <20120216160458 DOT GK19092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F401D73 DOT 7010908 AT acm DOT org> <20120220141749 DOT GA27701 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1329787780 DOT 8088 DOT 2 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20120221085827 DOT GA22597 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120221170945 DOT GL22597 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120221170945.GL22597@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Yaakov,

On Feb 21 18:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 21 09:58, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 20 19:29, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > As always, thanks for the testcase.  I think I found the problem.  It's
> > > > hard to explain if you don;t know how the code works, but it boils down
> > > > to the fact that my last round of patches back in August were not
> > > > actually fixing the problem, but only working around it.  I'm hopeful
> > > > that I got it right this time.  I'm just generating a new snapshot.
> > > > Please give it another hit with the APR testsuite.
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry to report that the 20120220 snapshot breaks the X server,
> > > which uses fcntl() with a lock file.
> > 
> > STC?
> 
> Btw., in how far is XWin broken?  I just tried to start it from the
> start menu and that worked perfectly fine.  I get the default xterm
> and that works.

I really need something reproducible here.  Otherwise I will release
Cygwin 1.7.11 this weekend.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple