X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com designates 10.50.203.66 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.203.66; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com designates 10.50.203.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com Message-ID: <1329787780.8088.2.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:29:40 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20120220141749.GA27701@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20120215153851 DOT GQ25918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F3C09D9 DOT 6000406 AT acm DOT org> <20120215204521 DOT GB27454 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F3C208B DOT 2060007 AT acm DOT org> <20120215212010 DOT GA4183 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F3C2E35 DOT 3080308 AT acm DOT org> <20120216140932 DOT GI19092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F3D2748 DOT 8080205 AT acm DOT org> <20120216160458 DOT GK19092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F401D73 DOT 7010908 AT acm DOT org> <20120220141749 DOT GA27701 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > As always, thanks for the testcase. I think I found the problem. It's > hard to explain if you don;t know how the code works, but it boils down > to the fact that my last round of patches back in August were not > actually fixing the problem, but only working around it. I'm hopeful > that I got it right this time. I'm just generating a new snapshot. > Please give it another hit with the APR testsuite. I'm sorry to report that the 20120220 snapshot breaks the X server, which uses fcntl() with a lock file. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple