X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:17:27 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <1451842453.20120210161727@mtu-net.ru> To: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin.dll version in bug reports In-Reply-To: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A51C567D1@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A51C567D1 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]! > I wouldn't presume to speak for the package maintainers. However, I > would guess that people assume that the package version is the latest. > (I do.) So if one is up to date, why the need to point it out in the > subject line? Because "latest" is not a version number. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 10.02.2012, <16:17> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple