X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAMAmNE+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABDr2CBB4FyAQEBBBIBHQpRAQgYCgYYB1cBBBsaokKBJwGXK4wNFTcaAgQCBAQDAYMYAYEZASuCOmMEiEiXeodx Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Cygwin.dll version in bug reports Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:04:27 -0800 Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31270C44E@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q19K5LBJ018419 "Christopher Faylor" wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: > > > >Today I sent a couple of bug reports. I based my "Subject" on the "Good > >examples" given at: > > > >http://cygwin.com/problems.html > > > >Since all the good examples had a cygwin1.dll version at the front, I > >thought that was expected. So I put 1.7.10 at the front, because that > >was the cygwin1.dll version I was using. > > The "good examples" mentioned in the problems.html page refer to > problems reported for the Cygwin DLL. OK, then I misunderstood the examples. Perhaps it would help to include some examples that cite the package version instead of the DLL version? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple