X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: carolus Subject: Re: Documentation on -mno-cygwin Accuracy Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:24:39 -0600 Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <1328569526 DOT 8848 DOT 3 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4F315473 DOT 8070106 AT gmail DOT com> <4F3180B1 DOT 7090007 AT aol DOT com> <20120207211251 DOT GF32219 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F31B073 DOT 9010501 AT arlut DOT utexas DOT edu> <20120208055848 DOT GC7184 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20120208055848.GC7184@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, you can easily bundle a program with the Cygwin DLL and have > it work fine. I confess to doing that for a while, until I learned about -mno-cygwin, but is that not a license violation? My understanding is that in order to conform to the license you must include the cygwin source code in the bundle. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple