X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:15:42 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.7.10-1
Message-ID: <20120207171542.GE3178@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 20120205162927 DOT GA5926 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120207141017 DOT GA3776 AT qp9482> <20120207142520 DOT GB3178 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120207151314 DOT GA3032 AT qp9482>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120207151314.GA3032@qp9482>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb  7 16:12, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 03:25:20PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb  7 15:09, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 05:29:27PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> So, here are two questions:
> >> 
> >> - Since you *knew* that the process.h header had moved for a month
> >>   (after all, it is "as for every snapshot"), why didn't you say a single
> >>   word that this may result in a problem with building gcc?
> I didn't know because /usr/include/process.h was still there. Only a
> "tar tvf" told me this today. Perhaps we should do:
> 
> rm `tar tf <last-cygwin-package-installed>`     # you got the idea
> before
> tar xf <new-cygwin-package-to-install>          # here also
> 
> at any cygwin package switch? Or at least compare the respective
> results of "tar tf". What do you think?
> >> 
> >> - Why is that such a big problem?  Changing process.h to cygwin/process.h
> >>   should work, right?
> Oh yes, sure. When you have the necessary pieces it's rather easy.
> For the record, also perl-5.14.2 seems broken.

I moved the file back to /usr/include for the next release, which will
probably not be too far in the future...


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple