X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F2FEDD0.8040102@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:12:16 +0100 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Performance degradation between Cygwin 1.7.7-1 and 1.5.24-2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/6/2012 2:08 PM, Jaswinder Bhamra wrote: > Hi, > > We are experiencing performance degradation between Cygwin version > 1.7.7-1 and 1.5.24-2. > > Recently, we have upgraded from Cygwin version 1.5.24-2 to version > 1.7.7-1. The simple test brings forward the performance degradation in > version 1.7.7-1 over 1.5.24-2. > > > bash-3.2$ while [ 1 ]; do date; done | uniq -c > 40 Mon Feb 6 17:58:13 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:14 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:15 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:16 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:17 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:18 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:19 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:20 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:21 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:22 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:23 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:24 2012 > 64 Mon Feb 6 17:58:25 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:26 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:27 2012 > 66 Mon Feb 6 17:58:28 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:29 2012 > 65 Mon Feb 6 17:58:30 2012 > > bash-3.2$ > > > # while [ 1 ]; do date; done | uniq -c > 16 Mon Feb 6 17:58:41 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:42 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:43 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:44 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:45 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:46 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:47 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:48 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:49 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:50 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:51 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:52 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:53 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:54 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:55 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:56 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:57 IST 2012 > 50 Mon Feb 6 17:58:58 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:58:59 IST 2012 > 51 Mon Feb 6 17:59:00 IST 2012 > 49 Mon Feb 6 17:59:01 IST 2012 > 51 Mon Feb 6 17:59:02 IST 2012 > > # > > As you can see the version 1.5.24-2 executes date command > approximately 15-16 times more than in version 1.7.7-1. > > The above test is done on MS Windows XP Professional version 2002 SP3, v.5857. > i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz, 3.16 GB of RAM. Care has been taken to perform > the above 2 tests one at a time under the same load average on the > machine. > > Is this performance degradation a known issue and does anyone knows if > this is already addressed in any Cygwin version higher than 1.7.7-1? > > Thanks, > Jaswinder Dear Jaswinder, your math looks strange 50/65 = 77 % so you are losing as performance 23% not 15 times For 15 times you should have 4-5 instead of 50 as result. Try last 1.7.10 and see if yo have any change. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple