X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <1328142965.1328.4.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: llvm/clang 3.0-1 silently ignores C++ exception handling From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:36:05 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4F29989B.1020701@t-online.de> References: <4F2835F0 DOT 5050704 AT t-online DOT de> <1328068369 DOT 5448 DOT 6 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4F29989B DOT 1020701 AT t-online DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 20:55 +0100, Christian Franke wrote: > Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 19:41 +0100, Christian Franke wrote: > >> Clang++ 3.0-1 does not produce any exception handling code. Unwind > >> tables and code within catch(.) {...} blocks are not generated. Throw > >> always abort()s program. > >> > >> Is this as excepted? > > As best as I can tell, this is an upstream limitation. > > Yes, http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11285 Much as I suspected, although you'd think such an unfortunate limitation would be documented somewhere. I honestly don't have the time or expertise to implement this right now, so I'm afraid this is an upstream case of PTC. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple