X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F29989B.1020701@t-online.de> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:55:07 +0100 From: Christian Franke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: llvm/clang 3.0-1 silently ignores C++ exception handling References: <4F2835F0 DOT 5050704 AT t-online DOT de> <1328068369 DOT 5448 DOT 6 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> In-Reply-To: <1328068369.5448.6.camel@YAAKOV04> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 19:41 +0100, Christian Franke wrote: >> Clang++ 3.0-1 does not produce any exception handling code. Unwind >> tables and code within catch(.) {...} blocks are not generated. Throw >> always abort()s program. >> >> Is this as excepted? > As best as I can tell, this is an upstream limitation. Yes, http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11285 Christian -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple