X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:00:54 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: find in root (/) results in stack trace
Message-ID: <20120201150054.GA29431@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <loom DOT 20120201T135424-360 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20120201T135424-360@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb  1 12:57, Heiko Elger wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm using the latest snapshot.
> 
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 PCFX061 1.7.10s(0.259/5/3) 20120201 05:28:17 i686 Cygwin
> 
> Rebaseall and peflagsall are done.
> 
> Executing "find ." in the root will force a stack trace.
> 
> ******* snip snip snip ****************
> ente59 AT PCFX061 /
> $ find . >/tmp/find.log
>       0 [main] find 8996 C:\Programme\cygwinTest\bin\find.exe: *** fatal 
> error - cwcsdup would have returned NULL
> Stack trace:
> Frame     Function  Args
> 0028B4D8  6102F96B  (0028B4D8, 00000000, 00000000, 20039A30)
> 0028B7C8  6102F96B  (6119BD20, 00008000, 00000000, 6119DB0F)
> 0028C7F8  61005F0C  (611CC458, 0028C824, 6228FE64, 00000000)
> 0028C818  61005F48  (611CC458, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, 6228FE64)
> End of stack trace
> Hangup
> ******* snip snip snip ****************
> 
> I noticed the problem yesterday with snapshot 2012-01-11.
> I reproduced it 2012-01-23 and latest snapshot from today 2012-02-01.
> 
> I checked this at home on my two private computers running Win XP and Win7 
> Ultimite (non 64bit version) with snapshot 2012-01-23
> and I cannot reprodue the error.
> 
> So perhaps it seems to be a 64bit problem!

This looks like a problem when recursing over the /proc/registry and
it doesn't look like a 64 bit problem.  I'll have a look.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple