X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject: Re: Use of acl on smb related filesystems
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:57:37 -0800
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <jfmrei$3ac$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <jfl22v$1cr$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20120124094739 DOT GI2456 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
In-Reply-To: <20120124094739.GI2456@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 1/24/2012 1:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> It's probably because your FS doesn't support ACLs.  Your mount
> output
>
>    //fs-irva-82/adefaria on /home/adefaria type netapp (binary,user)
>
> shows that the path points to a NetApp drive.  NetApp drives have
> various modes.  They can behave like FAT, NTFS, or a POSIX filesystem.
>  From your other report I assume it's set up not to support ACLs.
> What does
>
>    $ /usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
>
> print?
Ltsdo-adefaria:/usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
Device Type        : 7
Characteristics    : 10
Volume Name        : <CIFS.HOMEDIR>
Serial Number      : 0
Max Filenamelength : 255
Filesystemname     : <FAT>
Flags              : 40007
   FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH  : TRUE
   FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES   : TRUE
   FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK        : TRUE
   FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS        : FALSE
   FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION       : FALSE
   FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS          : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES  : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
   FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED   : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS    : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION    : FALSE
   FILE_NAMED_STREAMS          : TRUE
   FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME       : FALSE
   FILE_SEQUENTIAL_WRITE_ONCE  : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS  : FALSE

My guess is that FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS: FALSE is not a good sign.

Is this related to this thread: 
http://old.nabble.com/NetAPP---cygwin-1.7.7-1-avoid-Recycle-BIN-dot-files-td30236482.html?

In the next reply you advocate me getting a more recent "snapshot". Did 
you mean a more recent "release" or do you want me to move to 
"snapshots" (which I assume are sorta like betas. Skimming some of the 
history (sorry I have a meeting fast approaching) this seems like a 
fairly recent development. Has there been a resolution? (Gotta go, will 
check back later).
-- 
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple