X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:56:58 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <07939498.20120123145658@mtu-net.ru> To: Andrew DeFaria , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Putty and pre-shared keys with Cygwin's sshd In-Reply-To: References: <1910391597 DOT 20120121163937 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <1326199340 DOT 20120122003455 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <1838817585 DOT 20120122072825 AT mtu-net DOT ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, Andrew DeFaria! > I try to explain to people how getting Putty to do ssh, Reflection X to > do X11, FireFTP or whatever to do ftp, ActiveState Perl to do Perl, etc. > is the wrong way to go about putting together a good set of tools when > you can more simply just get Cygwin to do all of those things and have > all of those tools play nicely together. Here appears to be yet another > example... That's because you're wrong. If there's native program that do the work better, why not use native program? Especially since it's in many ways better? -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 23.01.2012, <14:55> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple