X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4F15F428.6040502@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:20:24 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ls does not show any output References: <4F1547C1 DOT 2050304 AT gmail DOT com> <4F155491 DOT 7040306 AT gmail DOT com> <4F15771D DOT 3090402 AT gmail DOT com> <20120117152338 DOT GB2446 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F15B694 DOT 3080104 AT gmail DOT com> In-reply-to: <4F15B694.3080104@gmail.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 1/17/2012 12:57 PM, marco atzeri wrote: > On 1/17/2012 6:36 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote: >> On 17 January 2012 15:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> This sounds as if you made an update without stopping all Cygwin >>> processes. Do you have some Cygwin services like sshd running? >> >> Could well be that. >> Is the setup.exe meant to check that ? If not, I think it should. > > Eetup checks and advise; you can override, but it is not recommended > and you need to reboot to allow windows replace cygwin1.dll that > was in use. > > For the other issue > 2 [main] bash 5320 c:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't allo > cate heap, Win32 error 487, base 0x4E0000, top 0x550000, reserve_size > 454656, al > locsize 458752, page_const 4096 > > the usual suggestion is "rebaseall" from dash shell I'd recommend a reboot before doing the rebaseall. If there's a replace of the new cygwin1.dll pending, best to get that in place first. Then you can check if you see the same error again and rebase as required. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple