X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:27:21 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bug#10468: BUG: Severe or critical - deletes existing files and leaves nothing. (cp) Message-ID: <20120110092721.GB2292@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4F0B59EF DOT 7080204 AT tlinx DOT org> <4F0B5FF6 DOT 8020501 AT redhat DOT com> <1288085577 DOT 20120110024514 AT mtu-net DOT ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1288085577.20120110024514@mtu-net.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jan 10 02:45, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Eric Blake! > > > On 01/09/2012 02:19 PM, Linda Walsh , wrote: > >> > >> > >> I was trying to copy a font dir from a unix to a windows machine. > >> > >> Problem is there are duplicates -- where only the case differs... > > > The problem is not in coreutils, but in your operating system's > > limitations, and in your configuration. Windows (and thus Cygwin) can > > be put in a mode where it preserves case (and I highly recommend doing > > so if you want your example to work): > > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive > > You're confusing case sensitivity with case preservation. > NTFS is (and always was) case-preserving filesystem. > FAT - depends on who's working with it, Windows functions are case-preserving > for most part. > However, you can turn case-sensitivity on for NTFS volumes as well, as the > article point out. > However, it isn't strictly right nowadays, AFAIK, in that you can access files > different in case without enabling of the global case sensitivity, through UNC > filenames. No, that's not right. The registry setting is necessary since it decides about the *kernel's* handling of casesensitivity. And the default is set to casesensitive=off. I never understood why Microsoft invented this registry setting with XP. The decision is usually done in two places anyway, FS-capability, application case insensitivity request, and now there is the additional registry setting which enforces caseinsensitivity on the kernel. This blog points to a possible reason: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2010/12/08/10101148.aspx Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple