X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TBC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOzYmVydCBLb2jDoW55aQ==?= Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:03:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GNU Guile 1.8.7 - readline is not provided To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pBUA4qab029739 I've tried to build Guile 1.8.8 myself. ./configure ran without noticeable errors and make executed as well, however during the build there were several warnings like the following: > *** Warning: This system can not link to static lib archive > *** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when> ... Where is readline, ltdl, et cetera—the ones Guile depends on. I'm not exactly sure, because I forget to save the log, but there were similar warnings about shared libraries too. I think Guile's package maintainer could only compile the exact same way I did ... sadly. I know jack about static / shared libraries, so I haven't got the faintest idea how to solve this. If anyone has a not too painful idea, please share it. Thanks! On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Róbert Kohányi wrote: > Just in case I've re-installed Cygwin from another repository, but the > problem's still present. > > Readline is downloaded, I can re-install it, keep it, et cetera. It > seems to me that Guile was compiled without the readline support > enabled, as the error says: "readline is not provided in this Guile > installation". I can live with that, but as Guile is a managed package > I'm reluctant to build it myself. Furthermore there has to be reason > why the feature is disabled (if it *is* disabled purposely). > > Thanks for the input though! > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Richard Troy wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, [UTF-8] Róbert Kohányi wrote: >>> Subject: GNU Guile 1.8.7 - readline is not provided >>> >>> Using a fresh installation of Cygwin with GNU Guile (during the >>> install process I've only selected this latter package explicitly) >>> I've tried to use Guile's readline support[1] unsuccessfully. >>> >>> As the documentation told me to, I've created a configuration file >>> (.guile) in my home directory and started Guile, but it raised an >>> error (guile.out) and I don't understand why. >>> >>> I've searched the mailing lists and found a previous release >>> announcement[2] where the package maintainer said that the readline >>> support is "OK" (although it was a previous release of Guile -- 1.5.x) >>> and listed the required libraries for it to work. During the install >>> all of these libraries were installed by setup.exe transitively >>> (cygcheck.out). >>> >>> Is this a bug in the release or readline support is omitted from >>> Guile's Cygwin version on purpose? >>> >>> If the latter holds it would be nice to know: "why?". Can't Guile be >>> build with this feature enabled? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Robert >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> I had a similar problem recently. I don't know if what you are >> experiencing is the same or not, but it probably is: Incomplete download >> and a (to my mind) broken dependency engine. Readline is fundamental, but >> when it was missing from my download - how, I have NO idea - none of the >> concluding scripts that are supposed to run after an installation >> completes actually ran. >> >> The solution was easy enough; Do the download part again, and explicitly >> include readline. Note that this mechanism of reloading also easily >> verified that that was in fact the problem because it didn't show up in >> the list of packages to possibly upgrade, delete, or whathaveyou. Merely >> pointing to a different repository solved the problem. >> >> I don't understand how the dependency engine lets this happen, but it >> does. >> >> Good luck, >> Richard >> >> -- >> Richard Troy, Chief Scientist >> Science Tools Corporation >> rtroy AT ScienceTools DOT com, http://ScienceTools.com/ >> -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple