X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4EF3FF8C.6060502@shaddybaddah.name>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:11:56 +1100
From: Shaddy Baddah <lithium-cygwin AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10
References: <announce DOT 20111206093746 DOT GA6222 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF2D79D DOT 2020809 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222092552 DOT GA31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF3027A DOT 7090503 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222104443 DOT GC31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF31077 DOT 8060705 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222111951 DOT GD31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF32BAC DOT 6060209 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222143338 DOT GE31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF342F8 DOT 2060001 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222154038 DOT GJ31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF3C8C3 DOT 1020605 AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
In-Reply-To: <4EF3C8C3.1020605@shaddybaddah.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Corinna,

On 23/12/11 11:18, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> On 23/12/11 02:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Dec 23 01:47, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>>> On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> Other than that I might have a solution.  I applied a patch which only
>>>> adds the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag if the calling process is member
>>>> of a job and the job allows a breakaway.  It works in my limited
>>>> testing, but it would be important to know if it works for you, too, of
>>>> course.  If you're not set up to build your own Cygwin DLL, please test
>>>> the next developer snapshot.
>>> Yes, unfortunately I am not set up at the moment to build dlls, so
>>> I'll eagerly await the next snapshot.
>> Uploaded.
>
> Yes, this is working now. Thank you very much.
>
> I will still try and see if our desktop support will allow me to
> disable the virus scanner for a short period to test if it made a
> difference with that faltering dll. I'll report back in due course.
OK, I worked with desktop support and tried the previous snapshot with
the virus scanner disabled.

As I expected it didn't make a difference. There is still the
possibility that there is some specific policy enforcement on my
desktop at play here. But that is speculation.

Thanks again,
Shaddy


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple