Message-id: <4EF29826.4010301@cygwin.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:38:30 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: sftp-server -h succeeds on cmd, fails on mintty
References: <4EF28545 DOT 4090901 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <4EF28709 DOT 8000208 AT cygwin DOT com> <4EF29183 DOT 8060408 AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
In-reply-to: <4EF29183.8060408@shaddybaddah.name>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/21/2011 9:10 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> On 22/12/11 12:25, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 12/21/2011 8:17 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm experiencing a wider problem with sftp'ing to/from a Cygwin sshd
>>> service. However as a starting point into debugging, I've identified a
>>> simple failure in the sftp-server that may give an indication into the
>>> wider problem.
>>>
>>> When I ran just a simple usage argument to sftp-server in a mintty
>>> session, the command failed:
>>>
>>> sbaddah@*********** ~
>>> $ /usr/sbin/sftp-server -h; x=$?; echo $x
>>> 127
>>
>> This works fine for me from mintty.  Just a shot in the dark but can
>> you try it with a local user?  How about a local user that's part of
>> the local Administrators group?
>
> Yes, this has made a difference. Thank you. I ran against a local
> user, although they were not a local administrator. It ran fine:
>
> portapps@*********** ~
> $ /usr/sbin/sftp-server -h
> usage: sftp-server [-ehR] [-f log_facility] [-l log_level] [-u umask]
>
> I guess that points towards a pseudo terminal handling glitch for a
> domain user, right?

Not definitely, no.  I just tried with my work account (which is a domain
account) and found no problem.  Although I can't compare directly with the 
your IDs, I have root(0) and Administrators(544) on mine.  Maybe try adding
these if you don't have them already.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple