X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:12:44 -0600
From: Brian Ford <Brian DOT Ford AT FlightSafety DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 16 byte pthread stack alignments
In-Reply-To: <20111221094211.GH23547@calimero.vinschen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.CYG.4.58.1112210937050.3076@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
References: <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 1112201743030 DOT 3964 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20111221094211 DOT GH23547 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I'm sorry.  I should have learned by now not to post at the last minute
before leaving for the day.  I always make mistakes and leave out
important information.  Thanks for considering my problem in spite of
these oversights.  More below...

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Dec 20 17:45, Brian Ford wrote:
> > I'm just headed home from work right now, but I thought I would let you
> > know of a regression from 1.7.9.  It appears the effect of this patch:
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00124.html

You were correct below that I cited the wrong patch.  I simply swiped the
wrong URL in a hurry; sorry.  This is the correct reference:

http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2004-q2/msg00108.html

> > is no longer working in the current snapshot.  I'll try to narrow it down
> > to which change caused the regression and send in an STC tomorrow.
>
> Is that the first Cygwin process started from a 64 bit process on 64 bit
> XP or 2003?

No; this is 32 bit XP Pro SP3.

Most of the rest of this has been cleared up I think, so I'll save any
further responses to later messages in the thread.  Thanks again for your
help.

-- 
Brian Ford
Staff Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew...

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple