X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,TW_VF,TW_XV
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4EECBD8C.2010409@gmail.com>
References: <32989786 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>	<4EEC34F4 DOT 9090409 AT bopp DOT net>	<32994383 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>	<4EECBD8C DOT 2010409 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:57:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD8GWstg_TP6Z=cMtGUUd+dpnwmy5rW9yNDbzxFmTLZ6BZrggQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sorry "people" (NOT MY taxonomy!!), but igncr IS flawed
From: Lee <ler762 AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/17/11, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 17/12/2011 15:50, manu0507 wrote:
>
>> - the script causing trouble comes in the GNU gdb distribution
>> gdb-7.3.1.tar.gz
>
>   Hah!  I know what's happened: you used a windows program such as winzip or
> similar to unpack the archive, and it's gone and "helpfully" munged all the
> line endings for you.  Use 'tar xvfz gdb-7.3.1.tar.gz' at the Cygwin shell
> command-line and you'll get a correctly unpacked version.  (There definitely
> aren't CRLFs in the upstream release of the configure scripts.)  Windows
> GUI-based archivers are well known for causing this problem.

7-Zip (from sourceforge) also works for unpacking tar.gz files for use
with Cygwin.

>   (Also, if you think that Eric's reply was "acrimonious", you're just having
> some sort of using-language-in-different-ways communication problem.  I saw
> it earlier and it seemed perfectly polite and proper to me, I honestly can't
> see what about it would offend you.)

+1

Lee

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple