X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Bengt Larsson To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:25:37 +0100 Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: References: <20111208184447 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20111209055613 DOT GC25544 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <9mt3e7pq5spnhfoi2hu8s70lhk95qbnrfo AT 4ax DOT com> <20111214122813 DOT GC30302 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20111214122813.GC30302@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Dec 9 12:58, Bengt Larsson wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:00:11PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote: >> >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote: >> >>>>With the DLL from 20111208, a bug seems to have returned: >> >>>> >> >>>>Wildcard match fail from a windows shell with non-ASCII characters >> >>>> >> >>>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/msg01079.html >> >>> >> >>>PLEASE be precise when reporting problems. Returned from where? >> >>>1.7.9? A snapshot from a week ago? A snapshot from a day ago? >> >> >> >>From the time I reported the bug in the link. This bug behaves >> >>identically. Should I describe it again or can you click the link? >> > >> >Your use of "seem to have returned" implies that the problem went away >> >at some point. Since the above link is from a time when the problem was >> >extant it isn't really useful to point at it. >> > >> >Again, what would be useful is some hint of when you think the problem >> >went away. Again, if you are reporting that it worked in 1.7.9 but >> >stopped working in a snapshot then that is something useful to know. >> >> Yes. That is what I'm reporting. It worked in 1.7.9 but had stopped >> working in the snapshot from 20111208. > >This will probably be fixed in the next snapshot (not in 20111213). Thank you. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple