X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= Subject: Re: Issues with TCP Window Scaling Factor and Cygwin Daemons Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:30:11 -0600 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pBEKUwYl001294 On 12/14/2011 12:25 PM, Jon Clugston wrote: > Did you do all these tests w/ the same Windows machine? I believe > that Windows XP always sets the WSF to zero, but newer versions > support scaling. Not sure if scaling works on XP, but the TcpWindowSize is not zero (by default). For XP the reference is this: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314053 Which doesn't mention the key to control scaling: Tcp1323Opts; so I guess it doesn't work. For TcpWindowSize the recommendation to get better performance is to set it yourself much bigger than the default (which usually is 8760). Still this doesn't explain why David is seeing a value of zero. Perhaps the specific computer has it configured that way. -- René Berber -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple