X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:28:13 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10
Message-ID: <20111214122813.GC30302@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 20111206093746 DOT GA6222 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <von1e7hvt0m3db5k04cmutg015h7ik0557 AT 4ax DOT com> <20111208184447 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <bjc2e71unkjf6o8pl3sr22jtplp47v2c3b AT 4ax DOT com> <20111209055613 DOT GC25544 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <9mt3e7pq5spnhfoi2hu8s70lhk95qbnrfo AT 4ax DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9mt3e7pq5spnhfoi2hu8s70lhk95qbnrfo@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec  9 12:58, Bengt Larsson wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:00:11PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
> >>Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
> >>>>With the DLL from 20111208, a bug seems to have returned:
> >>>>
> >>>>Wildcard match fail from a windows shell with non-ASCII characters
> >>>>
> >>>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/msg01079.html
> >>>
> >>>PLEASE be precise when reporting problems.  Returned from where?
> >>>1.7.9?  A snapshot from a week ago?  A snapshot from a day ago?
> >>
> >>From the time I reported the bug in the link. This bug behaves
> >>identically. Should I describe it again or can you click the link?
> >
> >Your use of "seem to have returned" implies that the problem went away
> >at some point.  Since the above link is from a time when the problem was
> >extant it isn't really useful to point at it.
> >
> >Again, what would be useful is some hint of when you think the problem
> >went away.  Again, if you are reporting that it worked in 1.7.9 but
> >stopped working in a snapshot then that is something useful to know.  
> 
> Yes. That is what I'm reporting. It worked in 1.7.9 but had stopped
> working in the snapshot from 20111208.

This will probably be fixed in the next snapshot (not in 20111213).


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple