X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4EE767D9.6070101@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:57:29 -0500
From: Tim Prince <n8tm AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: fortran open mpi - getting mpif77 and mpif90 to work
References: <32966392 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <32966392.post@talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:446290240:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33834ee767dd0272
X-AOL-IP: 134.134.139.76
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/13/2011 8:41 AM, Stitchz wrote:
>
> Is it possible to have a mpif90 command (mpi fortran 90 compiler) working
> under cygwin? I've tried to download several packages (open mpi, mpich2,
> ...) but the configure scripts always fail.
OpenMPI list indicated recently that cygwin support is a work in 
progress. I recall it depending on mingw cross compilation, but I may be 
wrong. mpich2 is pre-packaged, and works in a Visual Studio framework, 
as does current OpenMPI.
>
> Since a fresh install of cygwin includes the mpif77 command (even though it
> just points to a missing ifort.exe in the path), should mean that it SHOULD
> be able to work...
>
>
This doesn't make sense, nor to I see any evidence of it.  When ifort is 
supported, it's by an mpiifort wrapper, so as to avoid confusion with 
gfortran.  This would be a cross compilation, not using cygwin 
facilities, and would not be supported specifically by anyone, as far as 
I know.

-- 
Tim Prince

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple