X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: Bengt Larsson <lists DOT cygwin3 AT bengtl DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:58:01 +0100
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <9mt3e7pq5spnhfoi2hu8s70lhk95qbnrfo@4ax.com>
References: <announce DOT 20111206093746 DOT GA6222 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <von1e7hvt0m3db5k04cmutg015h7ik0557 AT 4ax DOT com> <20111208184447 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <bjc2e71unkjf6o8pl3sr22jtplp47v2c3b AT 4ax DOT com> <20111209055613 DOT GC25544 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20111209055613.GC25544@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:00:11PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
>>>>With the DLL from 20111208, a bug seems to have returned:
>>>>
>>>>Wildcard match fail from a windows shell with non-ASCII characters
>>>>
>>>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/msg01079.html
>>>
>>>PLEASE be precise when reporting problems.  Returned from where?
>>>1.7.9?  A snapshot from a week ago?  A snapshot from a day ago?
>>
>>From the time I reported the bug in the link. This bug behaves
>>identically. Should I describe it again or can you click the link?
>
>Your use of "seem to have returned" implies that the problem went away
>at some point.  Since the above link is from a time when the problem was
>extant it isn't really useful to point at it.
>
>Again, what would be useful is some hint of when you think the problem
>went away.  Again, if you are reporting that it worked in 1.7.9 but
>stopped working in a snapshot then that is something useful to know.  

Yes. That is what I'm reporting. It worked in 1.7.9 but had stopped
working in the snapshot from 20111208.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple