X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+optzaJ9AhXFR06fcgdYr+ Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 00:56:13 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10 Message-ID: <20111209055613.GC25544@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20111208184447 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:00:11PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote: >>>With the DLL from 20111208, a bug seems to have returned: >>> >>>Wildcard match fail from a windows shell with non-ASCII characters >>> >>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/msg01079.html >> >>PLEASE be precise when reporting problems. Returned from where? >>1.7.9? A snapshot from a week ago? A snapshot from a day ago? > >From the time I reported the bug in the link. This bug behaves >identically. Should I describe it again or can you click the link? Your use of "seem to have returned" implies that the problem went away at some point. Since the above link is from a time when the problem was extant it isn't really useful to point at it. Again, what would be useful is some hint of when you think the problem went away. Again, if you are reporting that it worked in 1.7.9 but stopped working in a snapshot then that is something useful to know. If you are just saying that you reported a bug two years ago and you notice that the bug is still there, that is not something that we urgently need to fix in 1.7.10 since it isn't a regression. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple