X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EE0B848.80206@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:14:48 -0500 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Machine very sluggish while compiling References: <4ECEE88E DOT 5050307 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20111125154751 DOT GP28395 AT trikaliotis DOT net> <4EDB2761 DOT 6040508 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20111204100639 DOT GA9849 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EE09CF8 DOT 7040804 AT bellsouth DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4EE09CF8.7040804@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 08/12/2011 6:18 AM, Robert Miles wrote: > On 12/4/2011 4:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Anyway, stoppping the PCA service and setting its start mode to "Manual" >> does the trick for me. While I was at it I also disabled Superfetch, >> which drops the memory usage of this svchost to a fraction of what it >> used before, and the CPU usage to 0%, and I don't see any performance >> difference. > Are you aware that the Superfetch service deliberately tries to use > most of the > memory not otherwise in use as a cache for the most frequently > accessed disk > files, in order to speed up accesses to those files? I've found it > rather slow to > release this cache memory when some other program needs it, though. In my experience Superfetch does a phenomenally bad job of predicting which files I (or my wife) actually plan to use. The machine is sluggish not (just) because the memory is uselessly tied up, but because the disk is constantly busy fetching data that will never be used and penalizes access to the data I actually do need. The memory wastage just compounds the problem by contributing additional swapping on top of all this other extra disk activity. Both computers at my house saw *significant increases* in performance and responsiveness when I disabled Superfetch a few months ago. Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple