X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems? Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:23:25 -0500 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <2edqd7hodgj4bgdiaeh4bstmb1jrfq4en2@4ax.com> References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A43ADEDCE AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <4EDD0FDF DOT 5090508 AT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > The first long time is likely to program loading and > > Antivirus time delay > > For me, it's consistently 1.9 seconds for that trivial pipe, even if I > run it several times in quick succession. I'm asking the support team > about reinstalling Symantec (I have seen a glitch with it), and maybe > if I get very very lucky I can talk them into another antivirus > solution. Or at least, while they're reinstalling it, if they can allow you to take 5 minutes while the AV services are shut down, you can rerun your commands and see if the time improves. Of course, that would expose you to the evil Cygwin viruses, so they probably won't allow it. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple