X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:45:38 -0600 (CST) From: Tim McDaniel cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems? In-Reply-To: <4EDD0FDF.5090508@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A43ADEDCE AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <4EDD0FDF DOT 5090508 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, marco atzeri wrote: > On 12/5/2011 5:20 PM, Tim McDaniel wrote: >> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Buchbinder, Barry wrote: > >> And I see slowness even when everything is a bash builtin (except >> perhaps for whatever is handling "|" -- I suppose it's forking bash >> itself): >> >> $ time echo hi | read x >> >> real 0m1.928s >> user 0m0.031s >> sys 0m0.031s >> > on my W7/x64, a not too fast Corei5 notebook ... > The first long time is likely to program loading and > Antivirus time delay For me, it's consistently 1.9 seconds for that trivial pipe, even if I run it several times in quick succession. I'm asking the support team about reinstalling Symantec (I have seen a glitch with it), and maybe if I get very very lucky I can talk them into another antivirus solution. -- Tim McDaniel, tmcd AT panix DOT com -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple