X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <1323051626.6872.9.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: libneon27 requires libproxy1 which requires libglib2.0_0 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:20:26 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 02:13 -0500, Matthew Smith wrote: > After running setup.exe to add a package I noticed something had decided > to pull in some gnome libraries. As best I can tell its due to libneon27 > requiring libproxy1 though I may be missing something else. I did manage > to find this regarding libproxy. The latest libneon27 does require libproxy1-0.4.7, which pulls in only libglib2.0_0, and I wouldn't count that as "some gnome libraries". > From http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-05/msg00605.html > >libproxy pulls in these packages as dependencies for its GNOME and KDE > >integration modules. libproxy was added as a libsoup-gnome dependency, > >for which these deps are anyways required. But if neon is going to use > >libproxy as well, these modules are not strictly required, so I removed > >their deps from libproxy0/setup.hint (and from the upcoming libproxy1 > >as well). > > So hopefully nothing else has changed and it's easy to fix. I'm not sure what your question is here. There's nothing here to "fix". Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple