X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Hancock Subject: Understanding versions of apps in cygwin suite Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 04:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 5 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com According to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=30309 , a bug with octave's wavread function was fixed in octave 3.2.3. My "cygcheck -cvs" shows an octave of 3.4.2, but I still get the bug. I was wondering if it is wise to assume that the app version number from cygcheck is the same as the version number from the gnu site? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple