X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,TW_PD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:30:28 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <748260321.20111201203028@mtu-net.ru> To: Oliver , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Will win32 style paths ever work in mksh on cygwin? In-Reply-To: <4ED74766.7010301@yahoo.com> References: <4ED74766 DOT 7010301 AT yahoo DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, Oliver! > On the other hand, the cygwin documentation seems to claim that cygwin > will support both, win32 style paths and POSIX style paths. Cygwin, as in, the utilities, when fed with native path - mostly works. Specific program on the inside of it - it's up to that program. > Are there any plans to make mksh on cygwin win32-path aware, or will > mksh on cygwin support only POSIX? You have to ask mksh author(s). > If it remains to be POSIX only, and pdksh apparently gone from the list > of shells, is the only alternative to rewrite all existing ksh scripts > that might use win32 style paths? The last trend in *NIX society, that I noticed, is to write portable scripts. Which means, they should work with /bin/sh. (The base POSIX shell implementation.) -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 01.12.2011, <20:26> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple