X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4ED34B65.8080701@lysator.liu.se> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:50:45 +0100 From: Peter Rosin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tetex-tiny bug References: <4ECFB8C8 DOT 3050103 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4ECFC497 DOT 9050207 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <4ECFC6D9 DOT 9070407 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4ECFC811 DOT 2090100 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> In-Reply-To: <4ECFC811.2090100@cs.utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ryan Johnson skrev 2011-11-25 17:53: > On 25/11/2011 11:48 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Ryan Johnson skrev 2011-11-25 17:38: >>> On 25/11/2011 10:48 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>>> It's been a couple of years since I fixed this [1] on my old >>>> computer, and now I had to fix it on the new one. Can someone >>>> please fix the tetex-tiny package? >>> My understanding is that tetex has not been maintained in years (neither cygwin nor upstream) and that we should all be using TexLive (cygwin-aware) or possibly MikTex (Windows native) at this point. My life has certainly become simpler since I realized this. >> Great, but where's the TexLive Cygwin maintainer? Are you volunteering? > That would be the good folks at http://www.tug.org/texlive/. Their unix > installer is cygwin-aware out of the box, or they have a native Windows > version if you prefer. I prefer to install Cygwin software with setup.exe, which is what a "Cygwin maintainer" provides, so I guess the good folks fail to deliver. Also, I'm sure TeX Live also sports a dependency or two that I would have to install, and maintain, manually. I prefer to keep my install free of any locally installed software (that I have not written myself). Sorry to sound so ungrateful, but I suspect you knew what I meant from the start - you certainly seem Cygwin-savvy enough, at least judging by other posts. I'm requesting a one-liner in a config file, is that such a big deal? Cheers, Peter -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple