X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EC7772E.7010605@etr-usa.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:30:22 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion References: <4EC2DDF5 DOT 9000403 AT gmail DOT com> <4EC3D428 DOT 5030605 AT bopp DOT net> <17010684424 DOT 20111117022022 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <4EC55B11 DOT 8090602 AT etr-usa DOT com> <1286468521 DOT 20111118024209 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <4EC5A338 DOT 9060302 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 11/18/2011 7:24 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote: > On 11/18/11, Warren Young wrote: >> >> How about "svn st -q ."? > > That prints nothing if the folder is up to date. Yes. And in the case the OP was concerned with, svn will complain bitterly if the folder isn't versioned. The worst side effect of doing it this way is that svn can be noisy if there's a lot of stuff changed in the folder at the time. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple