X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:49:03 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <785227862.20111117224903@mtu-net.ru> To: viper_88 , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with updating nearly any package meant for Cygwin or using packages such as libtool In-Reply-To: <32861517.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <32849825 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4EC2CFA2 DOT 40007 AT cygwin DOT com> <32857072 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4EC41689 DOT 8090601 AT gmail DOT com> <32861517 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, viper_88! > As you can easily see, most of the stuff is missing. It's a bit odd, though, > since when I look for, say, pcre (which I definitely had installed), I get > this: > Searching for installed packages matching pcre: > libpcre-devel > libpcre0 > libpcrecpp-devel > libpcrecpp0 > pcre > Searching for installable packages matching pcre: > libpcre-devel > libpcre0 > libpcrecpp-devel > libpcrecpp0 > pcre > pcre-devel > Hubert AT Hubert-PC ~ > $ > pcre is installed already, I think you need pcre-devel if you're looking to compile stuff that depends on it... -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 17.11.2011, <22:47> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple