X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_20,TW_SV
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
References: <D0CBCC01C005D44CB4009B8A6B532BE41F0B731B AT IAD2MBX11 DOT mex02 DOT mlsrvr DOT com>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <D0CBCC01C005D44CB4009B8A6B532BE41F0B731B@IAD2MBX11.mex02.mlsrvr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: RE: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion
From: Jeremy Bopp <jeremy AT bopp DOT net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:53:25 -0600
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <e6d63495-2b2f-438a-8308-4bf9e61aef0d@email.android.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com



Jim Garrison <jim DOT garrison AT troux DOT com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> On Behalf Of Jeremy Bopp
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion
>> 
>> That whole process is going to be unsupported here though, so is
>there
>> some reason you must remain on such an old release of subversion?
>
>Um... 1.7 just came out in the last few months, 1.6.17 isn't "such an
>old
>release".  Consider users who depend on clients (SVNKit) that don't
>yet have 1.7 native support (i.e. Subclipse).  We have to stay on 
>1.6 until ALL our clients support 1.7 due to the working copy 
>restructuring.  When 1.7 came out I saved a copy of the 1.6.17 
>distribution locally.

Seems that I stepped on some nerves due to my poor choice of wording. Sorry about that.

All I really wanted to know was why it was important to hang back from the latest available version when getting the older one was less than trivial. Not using anything more than the command line for svn (infrequently at that) made me forget how often that project changes formats in the working copies and the ramifications of that behavior.

Thanks for enlightening me. :-)

-Jeremy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple