X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: Jim Garrison <jim DOT garrison AT troux DOT com>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:06:11 -0500
Subject: RE: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion
Message-ID: <D0CBCC01C005D44CB4009B8A6B532BE41F0B731B@IAD2MBX11.mex02.mlsrvr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pAGN6cB9014265

> -----Original Message-----
> On Behalf Of Jeremy Bopp
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion
> 
> That whole process is going to be unsupported here though, so is there
> some reason you must remain on such an old release of subversion?

Um... 1.7 just came out in the last few months, 1.6.17 isn't "such an old
release".  Consider users who depend on clients (SVNKit) that don't
yet have 1.7 native support (i.e. Subclipse).  We have to stay on 
1.6 until ALL our clients support 1.7 due to the working copy 
restructuring.  When 1.7 came out I saved a copy of the 1.6.17 
distribution locally.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple