X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EC2EDB5.2030704@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:54:45 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries? References: <1320840871 DOT 13045 DOT 51 DOT camel AT kare-desktop> <4EC28AE7 DOT 70600 AT gmail DOT com> <4EC2916B DOT 9010400 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> In-Reply-To: <4EC2916B.9010400@cs.utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 15/11/2011 16:20, Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: >>> In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary >>> from the FLEXPART fortran code >> FLEXPART is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs that's >> just jam-packed with ginormous multi-dimensional arrays. The final linked >> executable had 3.38 GB of .bss space! > Out of curiosity, how then was the OP ever able to make *any* version run? Not clear yet but probably owing to changes in one or more of the array dimensions in the upstream source that he didn't notice taking place. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple