X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EBB13B7.2090103@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:58:47 -0500 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gdb broken inside emacs (again? still?) References: <4EBAF428 DOT 9040508 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <4EBAFF80 DOT 9020604 AT cornell DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <4EBAFF80.9020604@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 09/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 11/9/2011 4:44 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote: >> Running just `gdb' from emacs allows it to initialize, but >> attempts to load a file or indeed perform any command hang until a >> double-^C cancels the attempt (reporting "C-c C-cquit"). Ironically, >> even `quit' hangs, so you have to use ^D to exit. Debugging anything >> within emacs is thus completely impossible at this time. > cgf has already stated that this will be fixed in the next release of > gdb; see > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/msg00564.html Hmm. After dwelling longer on the above post chain... I think cgf was only talking about fixing the seg fault. Is this freezing somehow related? I didn't think it was. > P.S. If you're building your own emacs and using a Cygwin snapshot, > you'll need to apply my patch to fix the memory allocation problem > that we discussed a few months ago. You can get this by using > setup.exe to download the source for emacs-23.3-3. Built, but unfortunately no improvement in behavior by gdb. Is there some possibility those cygwin-specific patches somehow are tied up in this? The last time this came up a home-built emacs worked with gdb-7.3.50-1. As others have reported, gud-gdb can load and run binaries, but then emacs doesn't sync up its output with source files any more... BTW, I don't know if this has anything to do with anything, but `strace gdb' from the command prompt or inside emacs reports an infinite stream of seg faults: > 25 1231358 [main] gdb 4112 __set_errno: void san::leave():277 val 14 > --- Process 4112, exception C0000005 at 6111AE63 > 71 1231429 [main] gdb 4112 exception::handle: In > cygwin_except_handler exc 0xC0000005 at 0x6111AE63 sp 0x149C8F4 > 67 1231496 [main] gdb 4112 exception::handle: In > cygwin_except_handler sig 11 at 0x6111AE63 > 82 1231578 [main] gdb 4112 exception::handle: In > cygwin_except_handler calling 0x0 > 29 1231607 [main] gdb 4112 __set_errno: void san::leave():277 val 14 > --- Process 4112, exception C0000005 at 6111AE63 > 75 1231682 [main] gdb 4112 exception::handle: In > cygwin_except_handler exc 0xC0000005 at 0x6111AE63 sp 0x149C8F4 > 28 1231710 [main] gdb 4112 exception::handle: In > cygwin_except_handler sig 11 at 0x6111AE63 > 28 1231738 [main] gdb 4112 exception::handle: In > cygwin_except_handler calling 0x0 ^C kills the program, but attempting to type any other character hangs gdb, strace, and the terminal for good measure. Is gdb just known-unfriendly to strace? Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple