X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>
Subject: Re: Problem with execution of binary file
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:01:40 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <loom.20111108T104901-264@post.gmane.org>
References: <1320659540 DOT 5480 DOT 243 DOT camel AT kare-desktop> <loom DOT 20111107T201338-583 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Mark Geisert (that's me) wrote:
> I haven't yet diff'd the two cygchecks
> you sent but maybe that'll lead somewhere.

I've now done that.  The 'good' cygcheck shows many more packages installed than
the 'bad' cygcheck.  But the only package version differences I found were for
bzr, find and mercurial; the 'good' cygcheck paradoxically shows earlier
versions for those three packages.  Hard to see how those package differences
could matter though.

About the only thing I can think of, and it's a crazy idea, is that the 'good'
environment, with more packages installed, is somehow supplying something that's
emulated badly in the 'bad' environment.  Figuring out if that's the case would
involve building your executable with every possible "verbose" switch turned on
so you can identify exactly where every item going into the executable is coming
from.  Repeated in both 'good' and 'bad' environments.

Or, you could take heart that you've got a good build you can work with now and
just run with that.  Maybe somebody else has another approach to try.
HTH,

..mark


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple