X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:07:01 +0200 From: David Sastre To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Contributing license information? Message-ID: <20111025200701.GA6341@jethro.local.lan> References: <4EA60A43 DOT 3050804 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20111025135045 DOT GA22635 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111025135045.GA22635@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:50:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 25 12:00, Luke Kendall wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Aug 19 11:09, Luke Kendall wrote: > > >>Soon, I will have prepared a list of the location of every license > > >>file in every Cygwin package. My motivation is to make it easy for > > >>people to find the license information, if they need it. > > >> > > >>(Preparing this information has required a lot of work on my part, > > >>so I would be happy if something could be done to make it easy to > > >>keep the information up to date as packages are added and modified.) > > >> > > >>What is the best way to contribute the license-location information > > >>so it can be integrated into Cygwin? > > > > > >Just create a new package for the distro which keeps the information > > >and maintain it. Somebody will have to keep the information up to date > > >anyway. > >=20 > > Is usr/share/doc/common-licenses/ within the "base-files" package, > > supposed to be the place where all license information is collected? > > Should I just use that instead of creating a new package? >=20 > Sure, why not, if that's ok with David. You can also rip out the > usr/share/doc/common-licenses directory from base-files and create > a licenses package with all licenses. Just as you two want it. There's also another solution: include licensing information within base-files, and co-mantain it. It's already under version control. Luke, if it's ok with you, I'd go this way. --=20 Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk6nFuUACgkQ95urBFKZ7FZF5wD/eQHfMFqZ8xC4fLpw9JBw6j0Q hQocWcUcjSm/QD+oRVMA/2oWRgPa2KWtN1wim1oMDZc4aOTt73zKKjlrfWIpv6jy =enAQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--