X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EA6C8EF.9040100@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:34:23 -0400 From: Charles Wilson Reply-To: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: New versions of tcl and expect? [Was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: version 5.45 of expect/tcl] References: <4EA61179 DOT 8030109 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4EA61179.8030109@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/24/2011 9:31 PM, Craig Miller wrote: [text] Please don't imitate our official announcement subject lines. This is why I rejected your original post to cygwin-announce: that list (and, fairly speaking, the subject line format) is for official announcements by the duly appointed *cygwin* maintainers of cygwin packages. In any case, I'll repeat what I put in the reject message: > That's not what this list is for. Please open a discussion concerning > this new expect on the main cygwin list. I'll point out that there > is a long-standing issue with the cygwin tcl/tk packages, which right > now are sort of frankenstein part cygwin part native win32...and > efforts to fix that have met resistance for a variety of reasons. > > So...be prepared for an, err, "vigorous", debate... -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple