X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:51:56 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: base-files license? Message-ID: <20111025135156.GA18409@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4EA6693F DOT 2090905 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA6693F.2090905@cisra.canon.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Oct 25 18:46, Luke Kendall wrote: > In the "base-files" package, what license applies to the small > number of *actual shell scripts and skeleton files* under > etc/{defaults,postinstall, preremove}? > > Is it, perhaps, one of the common licenses that are collected > together and stored in base-files? If so, which one? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/msg00415.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple