X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4EA5A605.6060207@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:53:09 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110928 Fedora/3.1.15-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.4 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: rm -rf cannot delete the upmost directory level anymore on a Novell share
References: <4E9EFE31 DOT 20809 AT lauterbach DOT com> <20111020092033 DOT GA5988 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EA00B16 DOT 1030400 AT lauterbach DOT com> <20111020130941 DOT GB13505 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EA028C9 DOT 1040300 AT lauterbach DOT com> <20111020172937 DOT GD13505 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20111021091056 DOT GH13505 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EA18882 DOT 8040705 AT lauterbach DOT com> <20111021153543 DOT GH2976 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EA539E9 DOT 5080502 AT lauterbach DOT com> <20111024103136 DOT GC14623 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EA550C7 DOT 9080709 AT lauterbach DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA550C7.9080709@lauterbach.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/24/2011 05:49 AM, Franz Sirl wrote:
>> Thanks, it looks like expected now, given NcFsd's behaviour. Note
>> that this can't be fixed on NWFS. On NWFS, only the changes to
>> upstream coreutils as outlined in
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/msg00481.html will help.
>
> Yes, I noticed that one too, thanks. Any idea when the fix will show up
> in Cygwin's coreutils?

Hopefully this week.  I'm overdue for a coreutils build for cygwin, so 
building 8.14 + the upstream fix is on my list of things to do soon.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake AT redhat DOT com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple