X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:39:59 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Three snapshots yesterday! Message-ID: <20111021083959.GE13505@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20111021082503 DOT GA5192 AT po8371> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111021082503.GA5192@po8371> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Oct 21 10:24, Denis Excoffier wrote: > Hello, > > Three snapshots yesterday! Great! > > However, i discovered an irregularity for the last one: > > The cvs change by cgf dated 2011-10-20 21:35:59 > with Log message: > * fhandler.h (fhandler*::copyto): Free path_conv strings first. > * path.h (cfree_and_null): Rename and expand from cfree_maybe. > (path_conv &operator =): Call free_strings rather than freeing strings > directly. > > is included in the sources (cygwin-src-20111020.tar.bz2) and the > "Diff since 2011-10-17 (49k)" but it is not mentionned in the > "ChangeLog since 2011-10-17 (2k)" (and also not mentionned in > the winsup/cygwin/ChangeLog inside the sources). For the binaries > (cygwin-inst-20111020.tar.bz2) i cannot say. > > Is this under control? Yes, everything's under control. Thanks, The Central Scrutinizers :) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple